Why €800 Billion Is Enough to Change the Philosophy of “Sustainable Investing”
The European Parliament has approved a legislative change that effectively allows companies producing incendiary weapons, depleted-uranium ammunition, and even components of nuclear weapons to receive ESG labels. What only recently seemed incompatible with the very idea of ethical investing is now becoming part of a new European understanding of sustainability.
According to Euronews, this decision reflects a major political shift: when the EU needs to mobilize €800 billion to strengthen its defense capabilities over the next four years, even fundamental standards such as ESG can be revised and adapted to security priorities.
“Controversial” Weapons No Longer Block ESG Labels
The newly adopted reform means that companies involved in the production of incendiary weapons, depleted-uranium ammunition, and nuclear-related technologies will not be automatically excluded from the EU’s sustainability benchmarks. Moreover, these companies may now qualify for an ESG label, a marker traditionally associated with environmental responsibility, social standards, and transparent corporate governance.
This signals a broader redefinition of sustainability: defense and security are increasingly being framed as components of “social sustainability”, as the ability of states to protect themselves is also part of long-term stability.
Why Now: €800 Billion as the Decisive Factor
The EU faces urgent pressure to scale up defense production. Official estimates say the bloc will need up to €800 billion over the next four years. This level of financing is impossible to attract if major defense companies remain restricted or kept outside major investment indices under previous ESG rules.
Analysts note that the scale of the financial challenge is what ultimately drove the decision. When hundreds of billions of euros are at stake, the EU is clearly ready to reshape even long-established ESG principles.
The Commission’s Reasoning and the Shift in Investor Interest
The European Commission argues that international conventions refer to “prohibited weapons,” not “controversial weapons,” which creates room to limit exclusions and legally justify integrating a wider range of defense companies into ESG frameworks.
Growing investor interest supports this shift. According to Bloomberg, since February 2022 the number of ESG funds holding assets in companies linked to the nuclear sector has risen by more than 50% — clear evidence of evolving market attitudes toward the defense industry.
Political Disputes Inside Parliament
Despite opposition from the Socialists and Democrats, the Greens/EFA, and The Left, the initiative passed. Critics argue that broadening ESG criteria risks eroding the credibility of the entire concept.
Spanish Socialist MEP Jonás Fernández warned:
“This act does the exact opposite of what it promises, expanding the definition of ‘green’ to the point where it becomes meaningless.”
The Left’s MEP Marc Botenga told Euronews:
“This step was clearly designed to stimulate the production of innovative controversial weapons — from incendiary ammunition to lethal autonomous systems.”
A Turning Point for ESG — and for the EU
The revision of sustainability criteria shows that the older, idealistic model of ESG no longer fits the geopolitical moment. In a world facing escalating security threats, sustainability is increasingly understood as the ability of societies to defend themselves.
And when €800 billion is on the table, the European Union is ready to rewrite even its most fundamental standards.
This article was prepared based on materials published by Euronews. The author does not claim authorship of the original text but presents their interpretation of the content for informational purposes.
The original article can be found at the following link: Euronews.
All rights to the original text belong to Euronews.
