In a significant and unprecedented restructuring of U.S. foreign aid policy, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the Trump administration has completed its comprehensive purge of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). According to Rubio, 83% of the agency’s programs have been dismantled, marking a dramatic shift in the nation’s approach to international aid and development.
A Historic Shift in U.S. Foreign Aid
Rubio made the announcement via a post on the social media platform X, stating that the overhaul was the result of a six-week initiative led by the Trump administration and supported by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a division influenced by tech mogul Elon Musk. The initiative aligns with President Donald Trump’s directive, issued on January 20, to freeze foreign assistance funding and reassess the impact of tens of billions of dollars spent on international development programs.
Rubio expressed gratitude to the teams involved in the overhaul, acknowledging the “hardworking staff who worked very long hours to achieve this overdue and historic reform.” He emphasized that the programs that were eliminated had often failed to align with U.S. national interests, and in some cases, had even been counterproductive.
The Scale of the Overhaul
The restructuring resulted in the termination of approximately 5,200 of USAID’s 6,200 programs. “These programs spent tens of billions of dollars in ways that did not serve, and in some cases even harmed, the core national interests of the United States,” Rubio stated. The remaining 18% of USAID programs will now be transitioned under the control of the State Department in an effort to centralize and optimize their administration.
The Associated Press notes that this move represents one of the most dramatic shifts in U.S. foreign aid policy in modern history. USAID, which has played a critical role in global humanitarian efforts for over six decades, has traditionally been viewed as a vital tool in stabilizing regions, preventing conflicts, and fostering alliances through economic development and humanitarian assistance.
Controversy and Legal Challenges
The sweeping shutdown has sparked legal challenges from various quarters, including lawmakers and nonprofit organizations. Congressional Democrats have strongly opposed the decision, arguing that the dismantling of USAID’s programs, many of which were congressionally funded, required legislative approval. “This is not just an administrative action; this is a violation of congressional authority,” said a senior Democratic senator in a statement.
Further complicating the situation, lawsuits have been filed by numerous NGOs and contractors that had long-standing partnerships with USAID. These groups claim that the mass termination of contracts was unlawful and left them financially stranded. “Our organizations have been blindsided. This purge has left thousands of aid workers without jobs, cut off vital humanitarian assistance, and created chaos in international development efforts,” one lawsuit alleges.
Immediate Consequences on Global Development Efforts
The abrupt closure of USAID programs has had far-reaching effects on international humanitarian operations. Critical initiatives addressing epidemic control, famine relief, democracy training, and job creation have come to a halt. Nonprofit organizations and aid groups reliant on USAID funding have been forced to lay off tens of thousands of workers, both in the United States and abroad.
The disruption extends beyond organizations to individual lives. Many USAID staffers and contractors stationed worldwide now find themselves in limbo, waiting for unpaid salaries and travel expenses to return home. The uncertainty surrounding the remaining 18% of USAID programs, now under the State Department, has raised concerns about whether they will be effectively managed or further reduced in scope.
The Future of U.S. Foreign Aid
While the Trump administration’s decision to drastically reduce USAID’s footprint is consistent with its “America First” policy, critics argue that the long-term impact on global stability and U.S. diplomatic relations remains uncertain. Many foreign policy analysts warn that cutting off foreign aid may weaken U.S. influence abroad and create power vacuums that adversarial nations could exploit.
As the dust settles, the Biden administration or future governments may face pressure to reverse or modify these decisions. For now, however, Secretary Rubio’s announcement signals a definitive break from the traditional U.S. approach to international development, with implications that will unfold for years to come.
This article was prepared based on materials published by The Associated Press. The author does not claim authorship of the original text but presents their interpretation of the content for informational purposes.
The original article can be found at the following link: The Associated Press
All rights to the original text belong to The Associated Press.
